Page 11 - Kattison Avenue Newsletter - Spring 2026 - Issue 16
P. 11

Freer/Shutterstock.com                           Freer/Shutterstock.com




         targeted,  venue-specific  relief  obtained  after tours  began  and   on website screenshots, reinforcing limits on the theory that a
         injury  was  “concrete  and  ongoing”  was  necessary.  Specificity   seller’s willingness to ship to Illinois, without proof of actual
         and certainty are key, even if the offenders are unidentified John   sales, is sufficient to establish jurisdiction. See Liu v. Monthly, 170
         Does.                                                   F.4th 1090 (7th Cir. 2026).
         District of New Jersey: A New Hotbed for                With the game changing in Illinois, plaintiffs have altered their
         Schedule A Litigation                                   pattern of play, instead filing cases in New Jersey.

         With the World Cup Final taking place in New Jersey, a   In September 2025, District of New Jersey Chief District Judge
         jurisdiction that is no stranger to Schedule A litigation, John Doe   Renee Marie Bumb  issued  Standing  Order  2025-4  (Order)
         is sure to be outside MetLife Stadium for the match.    in  response  to  the  “uptick”  in  Schedule  A  cases  filed  in  the
                                                                 jurisdiction. The Order sets a strict set of rules to curb abuse
         Historically, the  Northern  District  of  Illinois  has been  the
                                                                 of the Schedule A scheme, striking a balance that lays out a
         favored jurisdiction for filing Schedule A cases, with the court
                                                                 mechanism for mark owners to utilize the Schedule A scheme
         even offering a “Schedule A Template” on its website. However,
                                                                 with boundaries, while curbing due process concerns.
         the last year has shown judges in the Northern District of Illinois
         are growing increasingly skeptical of the Schedule A litigation   Judge Bumb’s Order puts personal jurisdiction at the forefront
         model, with one judge pausing his Schedule A docket and another   of the inquiry, with the main concern being the targeting of large
         openly challenging plaintiffs’ generalized allegations and joinder   swaths of online sellers. Judge Bumb reasons, “[t]he law is well-
         practices.  On  March  9,  the  Seventh  Circuit  issued  a  ruling   settled that simply being an online seller on Amazon isn’t enough
         rejecting personal jurisdiction in a Schedule A case based solely   … [a] plaintiff cannot create personal jurisdiction by ordering a





                                                                                                                    11
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16