About Bonita L. Stone
In an area of the law that isn't known for quick results, litigator Bonita Stone values efficiency. Frequently representing private equity firms, their portfolio companies and financial institutions in litigation, she doesn't waste time on the irrelevant. With years of experience leading litigation teams, including delivering victories for clients at trial, she can swiftly size up any legal dispute.
Knowing when to move quickly
Fast-moving private equity firms need legal advisers that don't hesitate. Staying focused on her clients' goals, Bonita knows when it's best to settle before legal fees climb and when it's time to fight. She exercises that judgment for large private equity firms and their portfolio companies in complex commercial litigation, focusing on M&A disputes and labor issues. Her experience across many industries — including lending, technology and manufacturing — allows her to analyze any type of business dispute in the context of its competitive environment. Bonita also has handled the defense of many class action lawsuits across a board spectrum of issues.
Financial institutions acting as trustees for high-net-worth trusts call on her in sometimes-sensitive estate litigation. Bonita also understands the unique dynamics of family-owned businesses and has helped them resolve shareholder and partner disputes.
While Bonita places a premium on efficiency, she knows there are times when clients should pursue a more patient strategy, and, if necessary, take a fight to trial. Her trial work includes successful results for clients in matters involving breach of contract, shareholder and business valuations, theft of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duties, defense of age and other types of discrimination claims and non-compete agreements.
- Merger and acquisition (M&A) litigation
- Consumer fraud and consumer-related class actions
- Finance litigation
- Fiduciary and private wealth litigation
- Employment and unfair competition litigation
- Securities litigation
- Private equity
- Commercial litigation
- Shareholder and derivative lawsuits
- Lead trial counsel for a hospital on age discrimination claim. Trial before the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois resulted in defense verdict.
- Lead counsel for financial services company in multi-defendant consumer class action challenging arbitration clause. After dismissal by the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the matter was affirmed by the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
- Lead counsel on lien claim which was argued before the Delaware Supreme Court en banc resulting in a full verdict for the claimant.
- Lead counsel for American media company in age discrimination suit before the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Obtained favorable summary judgment that was affirmed by the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
- Lead trial counsel for plaintiff in a two-week preliminary injunction hearing to enjoin breach of a non-compete, which injunction was granted.
- Lead counsel for company that builds tracking technology and solutions on claims for breach of warranties, fraud and indemnity arising from an asset purchase.
- Co-lead counsel on behalf of a clothing corporation and its directors and officers in securities fraud class action arising from IPO.
- Co-lead counsel for class in securities fraud case, seeking to enjoin shareholder vote and proxy solicitation due to misleading proxy statement. Argued and secured temporary restraining order.
- Co-lead trial counsel for an operator of marine terminals in sexual harassment and sexual discrimination claims by multiple plaintiffs. After a three-week jury trial, obtained complete defense verdict.
- Lead counsel for plaintiff on claims of self-dealing, breach of fiduciary duties and asset dissipation against trustees, including preliminary injunction and evidentiary hearing for removal of trustees.
- Lead counsel for defendants against minority shareholder claims for securities and common law fraud and breach of fiduciary duties. After dismissal by the Circuit Court of Cook County, the ruling was affirmed by the Appellate Court for the First District of Illinois.
- Lead trial counsel for a marketer/distributor of consumer products in a preliminary injunction hearing against a former employee, which injunction was granted. Involved claims of breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition and misappropriation of trade secrets.
- Lead defense counsel in jury trial before the US District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding fraud and breach of warranties claims.
- Lead trial counsel for Wall Street investment bank on claims asserting brokerage and fee claims arising from investment banking services. After a bench trial before the US District court for the Northern District of Illinois the court entered a full judgment on the investment bank claims.
- Lead counsel for one of 12 defendants in class action alleging price fixing conspiracy to fix bids in property tax sale.
- Lead counsel for defendants in securities fraud claims arising from stock sale. After dismissal by the US District Court for the Northern District of California, argued appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which affirmed the dismissal.
- Substitute counsel in securing a reversal on appeal to the First District. Retried the case alleging usurpation of a corporate opportunity and fiduciary duty breaches and, upon a defense verdict, won the subsequent appeal.
- Lead trial counsel for surviving company and majority shareholders in squeeze-out merger and valuation case asserted by dissenting shareholders, tried in the Delaware Chancery Court before Chancellor Chandler.
- Lead counsel for plaintiff in shareholder's derivative suit, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and self-dealing.
- Lead counsel for plastic packaging manufacturer in preliminary injunction between competitors. Concerned claims of trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition and antitrust violations.
- Lead counsel for an insurance company in a class action alleging violations of various consumer protection statutes. After dismissal, and a reversal by the First District, the Illinois Supreme Court granted discretionary review and reversed in large part the appellate court.
October 20, 2022
December 3, 2015
February 19, 2015
February 28, 2012
January 18, 2023
December 4–7, 2018
November 19, 2018
February 28, 2018
November 20, 2017
November 21, 2016
November 23, 2015
June 29, 2015
Presentations and Events
May 17, 2011Speaker