This article discusses how recent decisions in Gruss v. Zwirn raise the stakes for practitioners inclined to share privileged material with government regulators, and suggests revised practices including reassessing language in standard confidentiality agreements, reconsidering the scope of voluntary productions and paying close attention to the contents of witness interview notes.
Related Professionals
-
-
Partner and Chair, Financial Markets Litigation and Enforcement Department+1.312.902.5379
-
Partner and Chair, White Collar and Internal Investigations Department+1.212.940.8543
Related Practices
Recent Articles
-
Merger Challenges Protecting Nascent and Increased Future Competition Under the First Trump Administration
May 29, 2025
-
John Collins, Zachary Arons Author Lexis+ Practical Guidance Article on Pre-2026 Estate Planning Considerations
May 19, 2025
-
Federal-Style CFIUS Review May Be Coming to Texas
May 14, 2025