This article discusses how recent decisions in Gruss v. Zwirn raise the stakes for practitioners inclined to share privileged material with government regulators, and suggests revised practices including reassessing language in standard confidentiality agreements, reconsidering the scope of voluntary productions and paying close attention to the contents of witness interview notes.
Related Professionals
-
-
Partner and Chair, Financial Markets Litigation and Enforcement Department+1.312.902.5379
-
Partner and Chair, White Collar and Internal Investigations Department+1.212.940.8543
Related Practices
Recent Articles
-
Legislating for a New UK Carried Interest Tax Regime
August 28, 2025
-
SkyKick's impact: English courts begin trimming broad trademark specifications
August 27, 2025
-
Assessing Strategies for Mixed-Use Pro Sports Projects
August 25, 2025