This article discusses how recent decisions in Gruss v. Zwirn raise the stakes for practitioners inclined to share privileged material with government regulators, and suggests revised practices including reassessing language in standard confidentiality agreements, reconsidering the scope of voluntary productions and paying close attention to the contents of witness interview notes.
Share This Page
Share This Page
Related Professionals
-
-
Partner and Chair, Financial Markets Litigation and Enforcement Department+1.312.902.5379
-
Partner and Chair, White Collar and Internal Investigations Department+1.212.940.8543
Related Practices
Recent Articles
-
SEC's Proposed Custody Rule Changes And What They Mean
March 21, 2023
-
Is it time to move the goalposts on social media?
March 16, 2023
-
What Can HR Expect From Jeremy Hunt's 'Back to Work' Budget | People Management
March 14, 2023