This article discusses how recent decisions in Gruss v. Zwirn raise the stakes for practitioners inclined to share privileged material with government regulators, and suggests revised practices including reassessing language in standard confidentiality agreements, reconsidering the scope of voluntary productions and paying close attention to the contents of witness interview notes.
Related Professionals
-
-
Partner and Chair, Financial Markets Litigation and Enforcement Department+1.312.902.5379
-
Partner and Chair, White Collar and Internal Investigations Department+1.212.940.8543
Related Practices
Recent Articles
-
New York Passes Law to Protect Models On and Off the Runway
July 17, 2025
-
Get to Know: Anita Hodea
July 17, 2025
-
Chanel's Legal Victory Sends a Clear Message: Authenticity Isn't Just a Luxury — It's the Law
July 17, 2025