This article examines how the US Supreme Court's decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.—regarding whether courts should give preclusive effect to decisions made by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) rulings— was recently applied by a U.S. District Court on the issue of priority in Ashe v. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Related Professionals
-
Partner and National Co-Chair, Trademark/Copyright/Privacy Group+1.212.940.8554
-
Related Practices
Related Industries
Related Offices
Recent Articles
-
New FCA Rules on Reporting Material Outsourcings
September 11, 2026
-
Reviewing Fashion Product Designs from an Intellectual Property Perspective
September 11, 2026
-
Derivatives 2026: Law and Practice | Trends and Developments – England and Wales
September 1, 2026