Katten represented Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. in winning a judgment against Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in significant patent litigation over its epoprostenol formulation patents.

In a precedential decision issued on May 13, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Northern District of West Virginia's ruling that Mylan's proposed generic epoprostenol product doesn’t infringe Actelion's asserted patents relating to formulations of epoprostenol, the active ingredient in Actelion's Veletri® product. The decision, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 2024-1641, caps a second successful win at the Federal Circuit for Mylan, following the court's 2023 decision vacating an earlier judgment and remanding for further consideration of extrinsic evidence.

The Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that the asserted patent claims required pH measurements to be taken at standard temperature conditions and that Mylan’s product didn’t meet the claimed "pH of 13 or higher" limitation under that construction. The court also held that Actelion was barred from asserting infringement under the doctrine of equivalents based on prosecution history estoppel and the disclosure-dedication rule.

The precedential Federal Circuit decision is expected to have significant implications for Hatch-Waxman and pharmaceutical patent litigation, particularly with respect to the disclosure-dedication doctrine and prosecution history estoppel. The ruling has drawn widespread industry and media attention, including coverage from Bloomberg Law, Reuters and other leading legal and intellectual property outlets, for its analysis of contextual claim construction and patent disclosure principles.

The Katten team was led by Partners Deepro Mukerjee, Lance Soderstrom, Jitendra Malik, Eric Werlinger and Timothy Gray, and Associate Jillian Schurr-Hendrix. Eric Werlinger argued the case before the Federal Circuit. Katten's Intellectual Property practice represents leading pharmaceutical and life sciences companies in high-stakes Hatch-Waxman and appellate litigation nationwide.

"Fed. Circ. Won't Save Actelion's Suit Over Hypertension Drug," Law360, May 13

"Twice Ambiguous: Actelion v. Mylan and the Contextual Reading of pH 13," Patently-O, May 13

"CAFC Says Generic Hypertension Drug Does Not Infringe Actelion’s Patents," IP Watchdog, May 13

"Viatris Hypertension Drug Doesn’t Copy J&J Patents, Court Says," Bloomberg Law, May 13

"CAFC: Mylan's generic drug does not infringe Actelion's patents," Drug Store News, May 14

"PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Actelion's epoprostenol formulation patents not infringed by Mylan's generic product," VitalLaw, May 14

"Mylan Epoprostenol Win Clarifies US Measurement Rules And Equivalents Limits," Citeline, May 14

"Validity of Actelion patent hinges on temperature," BioWorld, May 15

"A Bitter pH-ill to Swallow: Federal Circuit Affirms Mylan's Win Over Actelion's Epoprostenol Drug Patents," National Law Review, May 18