Intellectual Property national co-chair Karen Artz Ash and partner Bret Danow discuss The Urock Network, LLC v. Umberto Sulpasso, a case in which the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) held that a party who unsuccessfully opposes an application for a specific mark is prohibited from petitioning to cancel the registration that subsequently issues for such mark. They note that decision confirms that "a party only gets one bite of the proverbial apple if it opposes a trademark application."
Related Professionals
-
Partner and National Co-Chair, Trademark/Copyright/Privacy Group+1.212.940.8554
-
Related Practices
Related Industries
Related Offices
Recent Articles
-
Heading For An M&A? Understand The Risks And Mitigation Strategies For Clinical Trial Agreements
November 11, 2025
-
The success in the High Court of Stability AI against Getty Images regarding the legality of AI models using troves of copyrighted data without permission | Edward Fennell's Legal Diary
November 7, 2025
-
SHORT THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK: All Present and Incorrect? | Edward Fennell's Legal Diary
November 7, 2025