Intellectual Property national co-chair Karen Artz Ash and partner Bret Danow discuss The Urock Network, LLC v. Umberto Sulpasso, a case in which the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) held that a party who unsuccessfully opposes an application for a specific mark is prohibited from petitioning to cancel the registration that subsequently issues for such mark. They note that decision confirms that "a party only gets one bite of the proverbial apple if it opposes a trademark application."
Related Professionals
-
Partner and National Co-Chair, Trademark/Copyright/Privacy Group+1.212.940.8554
-
Related Practices
Related Industries
Related Offices
Recent Articles
-
What you need to know about the EU Data Act and its extraterritorial scope
October 7, 2025
-
Ownership and Governance Structures | Private Trust Companies: A Handbook for Advisers | Second Edition
October 1, 2025
-
AI Usage in the Banking and Financial Services Industry and the Current State of Regulation and Litigation Involving AI
October 1, 2025