Intellectual Property national co-chair Karen Artz Ash and partner Bret Danow discuss The Urock Network, LLC v. Umberto Sulpasso, a case in which the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) held that a party who unsuccessfully opposes an application for a specific mark is prohibited from petitioning to cancel the registration that subsequently issues for such mark. They note that decision confirms that "a party only gets one bite of the proverbial apple if it opposes a trademark application."
Related Professionals
-
Partner and National Co-Chair, Trademark/Copyright/Privacy Group+1.212.940.8554
-
Related Practices
Related Industries
Related Offices
Recent Articles
-
Confirming a Negative: CFTC Staff Issue an Advisory Clarifying When Foreign-Organized Entities Are Trading and Brokering Digital Asset Derivatives Outside of the Commission's Cross-Border Jurisdiction
July 1, 2025
-
AI for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers: Legal and Regulatory Considerations
June 30, 2025
-
Christopher Hitchins & Maya Sterrie: Mandatory Ethnicity and Disability Pay Gap Reporting — What to Expect?
June 16, 2025